Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn’t what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that purports to refute global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say?
Posted on 13 April 2020 by greenman3610
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections
“The broad shape of the story is the same.”
With those nine words, columnist and 2008 Nobel Prize winner in economics Paul Krugman considers the coronavirus’ climate change issues.
A regular New York Times columnist, Krugman says in this month’s “This Is Not Cool” video that “we might have dealt with the climate change threat” more effectively “if the political right hadn’t developed its own